No Monkey Trial in History
The trial was arranged by the city fathers to get some publicity for their town. Both Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan knew this was a show trial, but went along so as to have a podium from which to speak their views.
See: http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/evolut.htm
"A year later, the Tennessee Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Dayton court on a technicality--not the constitutional grounds as Darrow had hoped. According to the court, the fine should have been set by the jury, not Raulston. Rather than send the case back for further action, however, the Tennessee Supreme Court dismissed the case. The court commented, "Nothing is to be gained by prolonging the life of this bizarre case."